Here’s an analysis of the Carpenter v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. case. You can read the full Order by clicking here.
Case Background
- Parties: Jeffrey W. Carpenter (Plaintiff) vs. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. (Defendant)
- Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division
- Nature of Case: This is a “Stowers” case, which generally concerns an insurer’s responsibility to settle claims within policy limits to protect its insured from excess liability.
Procedural History
- The court previously denied Twin City’s motion for summary judgment, siding with Carpenter’s interpretation of the insurance policy.
- Twin City later admitted all elements of Stowers liability except for the scope of insurance coverage.
- Carpenter then moved for summary judgment on coverage, which the court granted.
- The only remaining dispute was about postjudgment interest on the judgment amount.
Key Issue
Should postjudgment interest apply to the entire amount of the judgment, or just to a portion (specifically, appellate attorney’s fees)?
- Carpenter wanted postjudgment interest on the entire judgment.
- Twin City argued that they had accepted Carpenter’s prior offer to waive postjudgment interest on all amounts except appellate attorney’s fees, and that only the fees should accrue interest.
Court’s Reasoning
- Federal Law Controls: In diversity cases, federal law (28 U.S.C. § 1961(a)) mandates postjudgment interest on any money judgment in a civil case.
- Awarding such interest is not discretionary unless the parties stipulate otherwise.
- No Valid Stipulation: The court found no enforceable written agreement between the parties to waive interest on any part of the judgment.
- Under Texas law, any agreement between attorneys or parties must be in writing, signed, and filed to be enforceable.
- Defendant’s Argument Rejected: Twin City’s claim that interest couldn’t exceed the underlying state court judgment was found irrelevant, since the statute mandates interest on the judgment amount.
- Precedent: The court referenced another Texas federal court (OneBeacon Ins. Co. v. T. Wade Welch & Assocs.) that awarded postjudgment interest on the entire state court judgment in a similar context.
Conclusion and Outcome
- The court ruled in favor of Carpenter, holding that he is entitled to postjudgment interest on the entire amount of the underlying judgment—not just the appellate attorney’s fees.
- The final judgment will be consistent with Carpenter’s proposal.
In short:
The court sided with the plaintiff, Jeffrey Carpenter, stating that postjudgment interest must be awarded on the full amount of the judgment by law, absent a written stipulation to the contrary—which did not exist here. The defendant’s attempt to limit interest only to a portion of the judgment failed.
Girards Law Firm specializes in severe injury and wrongful death cases, especially those that involve birth injuries, brain damage, heart damage, spinal cord injuries or severe burns in Texas, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Contact us at www.girardslaw.com by using the chat feature for more information.